<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Monday, October 31, 2005

Employers seeking to control private lives of employees 

CBS brought to you by Fark-linkage

You know, I am all for property rights in that if someone doesn't want something on their property, they have every right to say that. But when you control the private lives of your employees and the legal activities they pursue, you have crossed the line.

Link is to the printable version, so that you don't have to suffer through the ads that you don't know you are clicking to. How's that for 'skip this ad', See-BS assholes?


people had something to say.

Alito 

Thanks to RedState.org through Emperor Misha, we have found some credentials for Judge Alito here on TownHall.com. These are the things that piss of the Dems, so we like them. Well, some of them. We won't comment on the others, because we don't know all the facts or refuse to entangle ourselves in a hornets nest, like the overturning of Roe.

Some highlights:

Alito Dissented from Decision Upholding Conviction Under Federal Gun Laws; Argued that Congress Had No Right to Enact the Law. Alito also dissented from a decision upholding a conviction under the federal law prohibiting the transfer or possession of machine guns, claiming that there was not sufficient evidence in the record to show that Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to enact the law. [See United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 807 (1997)]

Alito Would Require Women to Notify Husbands Before Exercising Her Reproductive Rights. Alito wrote a troubling opinion concerning reproductive rights in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. The Third Circuit in Casey upheld a number of the provisions in the restrictive abortion law enacted by Pennsylvania in the late 1980’s, in an opinion that questioned Roe v. Wade. But the Third Circuit struck down the law’s requirement that women notify their spouses before having an abortion. Alito dissented because he would have gone even further than the rest of the court and would have upheld the spousal notification requirement. He claimed that there was no showing that there would be an undue burden on women from this mandate. [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 947 F.3d 682 (3d Cir. 1991) , aff’d in part, rev’d in part 505 U.S. 833 (1992); Washington Times, 10/29/91]

Alito Ruled That Investors That Bought Junk Bonds In Donald Trump’s Defunct Casino Were Not Eligible For Compensation. The 3rd Circuit Court dismissed ten consolidated lawsuits filed by investors who bought $675 million in junk bonds from Donald Trump’s Taj Mahal Casino. The investors felt that they were misled by about the amount of debt the Casino had accumulated and the risk inherent in the investment. [Pennsylvania Law Journal, 10/25/93]


1. Glad we agree. Congress has been raping that "commerce clause" for FAR too long. And it REALLY pisses of Ted "Err, ahh, how did this water get in my scotch" Kennedy. And it logically follows that if it pisses him off, then Kerry, Reed (D-NH), Diane "Turn them all in, Mr. and Mrs. America" Feinstein, and Schumer (D-NJ) must really have their panties in a wad. And I can't say that it upsets me much.

2. Well, exactly who fathered the child/fetus/lump of tissue? If your dog had to be put down, would that not be a family decision? Do you just go out and shoot it because it had something other than rabies? If it had a bum leg, bee stings, or got into fight with another dog, would you not consult your other half and vet? But its somehow different when its a baby? "Its inside me, its my decision" you say? Umm, exactly how did it get created? Shouldn't someone who had a part in creating it have some say or at least the right to know beforehand (and the right to bitch about it) in the decision to destroy it?

3. Investing is risky. How many lawsuits do you see trying to get money back from the dot-com burst?


Personally, Bush could have done better. But I will reserve full judgement until I learn more about the man and his carrer, along with the types of decisions he has made and will more than likely keep making on the Supreme Court.


people had something to say.

Thursday, October 27, 2005

You know oil prices are high when... 

MyWay News

A Republican wants to know whats up and convenes Senate hearings to investigate.

'Bout damn time too. With oil companies posting record profits again and again while the rest of the country is pinching pennies just to go to work, someone needs to do something.

The oil companies are going to feel the pinch themselves when trucks stop moving. When people stop shipping goods and stop going places via cars and planes, they WILL reap exactly what they have sewn. But of course, the economy will be completely in the shitter by then, and the Depression will look like a mild trough.


I also feel compelled to tell each and everyone of you to go Google "Thermal Depolymerization" and how it can give us $8 per barrel oil via our own societal waste. $8 is their cost, so with an outrageous profit margin of %50, we could have $12/barrel oil again. w00t!


people had something to say.

Well, Miers is out 

USA Today

And I am glad. I couldn't find more than a few words about her serving as the president of the Texas Bar and that she was a lawyer, who soon became Bush's top lawyer. It was like he nominated a ghost; she was there, yet she wasn't. Roberts had a history of law and judging. He had bona fide credentials in Constitutional Law.

Personally, I agree with many out there in the hopes that Bush grows a pair and nominates someone like Janice Rogers Brown or Alice Batchelder. (Bios here).


people had something to say.

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Blah Blah, Israel is bad, Blah Blah 

Israel 'must be wiped from map'

Go read it, or I can save you the trouble and tell you that some Iranian is venting his witless prattle about how Israel is evil and anyone who recognizes it as a legitimate country, entity, etc, will burn with Israel. Blah Blah Blah.

High Points:


TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iran's new president has repeated a remark from a former ayatollah that Israel should be "wiped out from the map," insisting that a new series of attacks will destroy the Jewish state, and lashing out at Muslim countries and leaders that acknowledge Israel.

*snip*

Ahmadinejad quoted a remark from Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of Iran's Islamic revolution, who said that Israel "must be wiped out from the map of the world."

The president then said: "And God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism," according to a quote published by IRNA. ( Yeah, good luck with that. )

*snip*

He also described Israel's disengagement from Gaza as a "trick" meant to make "Islamic states acknowledge the Zionist regime of Israel," according to the report.

The United States and Israel are sowing "discord among warring forces in Palestine and other parts of the Islamic world," the report paraphrased Ahmadinejad as saying.

In the process, such attempts were forcing Muslim nations to normalize relations with Israel, he said.

Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying, "Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury."
All those with a good track record against the Jewish people and Jewish state speak up now. *crickets* Huh, kinda what I thought. I guarantee that Israel is not impressed with his little tirade.

Edit: Check out what Emperor Misha says about this.


people had something to say.

'Ol Waffles at it again, needs to STFU 

Communist News Network gives sKerry another soap box

Sen. John Kerry says President Bush should bring home 20,000 troops from Iraq over the Christmas holidays if the December parliamentary elections there are successful.
They will be brought home when they need to be brought home, and not a second before. One does not change a tire and forget the lugnuts, and one does not pull out of a war prematurely. You bring the troops home when the job is finished and assets are in place to keep the area secure and stable. If you had paid attention in Viet Nam and fought in the war instead of writing up bogus reports for scratches and disgracing your commission and your country, you would know that.

Defeated by Bush (Thank God, despite what I think of Bush) last year and a potential candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, Kerry called for a "reasonable time frame" for pulling back troops rather than a full-scale withdrawal advocated by some Democrats. He said it could be completed in 12 to 15 months.

"It will be hard for this administration, but it is essential to acknowledge that the insurgency will not be defeated unless our troop levels are drawn down ... starting immediately after successful elections in December," Kerry said in a speech Wednesday at Georgetown University.
Umm, let me get this straight...Pulling out the Armed Forces responsible for stopping the hemmoragic nature of insurgent terrorists into Iraq and training Iraq's new Army and Police is going to defeat the insurgency. What the fuck are you smoking? Where do you get this shit? What military strategy college did you attend again? Was it in France, by any chance? Thank God you aren't a doctor...

"Hmm, this guy over here is bleeding...what can I do. Well, he is bleeding from a gunshot wound, so my best guess is to shoot him again. *BANG* Hmm, he is still bleeding. Bob, bring out the machine gun, this guy is going to take quite a bit of work!"


The presence of 159,000 U.S. troops in Iraq is deterring peace efforts, said Kerry, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Umm, if you listen to the opposition, of course they are going to say that the presence of our troops are causing the peace process to come to an abrupt halt. Nevermind the people that keep shooting at our boys...

"To undermine the insurgency, we must instead simultaneously pursue both a political settlement and the withdrawal of American combat forces linked to specific, responsible benchmarks," he said. "At the first benchmark, the completion of December elections, we can start the process of reducing our forces by 20,000 troops over the course of the holidays."
Oh, yes...a political settlement. And what Arab nation has EVER been swayed or intimidated by mere words? And you are on the foreign relations committee? You might want to take a class on the history of the Arab world.

Kerry, who voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq, has been a strong critic of Bush's handling of the war, accusing the president of misleading the public into going to war.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.
He voted for it before he voted against it, and he would have done the same things, only better. He voted for it based on the same evidence the President saw. Therefore, the war-mongering doubletalker needs a tall, frosty glass of shut the fuck up. Unfortunately, I hear its tough to get that stuff on draught these days.


people had something to say.

Administrative error or blatant disreguard? 

FBI inteligence violations (via SlashDot)

*snip*
Records turned over as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit also indicate that the FBI has investigated hundreds of potential violations related to its use of secret surveillance operations, which have been stepped up dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but are largely hidden from public view.

In one case, FBI agents kept an unidentified target under surveillance for at least five years -- including more than 15 months without notifying Justice Department lawyers after the subject had moved from New York to Detroit. An FBI investigation concluded that the delay was a violation of Justice guidelines and prevented the department "from exercising its responsibility for oversight and approval of an ongoing foreign counterintelligence investigation of a U.S. person."

In other cases, agents obtained e-mails after a warrant expired, seized bank records without proper authority and conducted an improper "unconsented physical search," according to the documents.

*snip*

The records were provided to The Washington Post by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, an advocacy group that has sued the Justice Department for records relating to the Patriot Act.

David Sobel, EPIC's general counsel, said the new documents raise questions about the extent of possible misconduct in counterintelligence investigations and underscore the need for greater congressional oversight of clandestine surveillance within the United States.

"We're seeing what might be the tip of the iceberg at the FBI and across the intelligence community," Sobel said. "It indicates that the existing mechanisms do not appear adequate to prevent abuses or to ensure the public that abuses that are identified are treated seriously and remedied."

FBI officials disagreed, saying that none of the cases have involved major violations and most amount to administrative errors. The officials also said that any information obtained from improper searches or eavesdropping is quarantined and eventually destroyed.


Like the man said, tip 'o the iceburg. Ugh.


people had something to say.

Monday, October 24, 2005

Oil-For-Food joins hand in hand with Al-Queda 

Read here.

A tiny snippet:

New details of how dark the scandal could prove to be have emerged from the private sale of IHC on June 3, 2005, just as the procurement scandal was about to break. It now appears that while doing business with the U.N., IHC had links both to Saddam Hussein’s old sanctions-busting networks, and to a Liechtenstein-based businessman, Engelbert Schreiber, Jr., known among other things for his ties to a figure designated by the U.N. itself as a financier of Al Qaeda.


people had something to say.

Miers nomination looks sketchy at best 

Nominee lacks votes...(via Drudge)

Edited @ 2am 10/25/05: RedState.org reports that the White House seeks to find another candidate, on the QT. Thanks to Alpha Patriot for the link.


The shortfall could presage another political problem for the president, who unexpectedly ran into opposition from fellow Republicans questioning not only Miers's conservative credentials but also her grasp of constitutional law.
Now why would that be? Maybe because no evidence of either (that I can find) exists? She worked at the side of Republicans. Ok, I have voted for Republicans. Does anyone reading my works ever describe me as a raving neocon-GOP hack?

Since her nomination on October 3, Miers, a former head of the Texas Bar Association and now legal counsel to Bush, has been making the rounds of Capitol Hill, talking to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee while the president and his aides used every opportunity to promote her candidacy.

So far, it appears, to no avail.
So, common sense is alive. On life support, but alive...

"I think, if you were to hold the vote today, she would not get a majority, either in the Judiciary Committee or on the floor," said Democratic Senator Charles Schumer, who appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press" show Sunday.

He said he was aware of only one or two members of the committee, who firmly support the nominee right now and that hearings set to begin November 7 would be a make-or-break undertaking for Miers.

"I think you have concern on these three areas -- qualification, independence, judicial philosophy -- by people of both parties and all political stripes," Schumer pointed out.
Schumer is about as qualified to choose or pontificate on good Judicial Candidates as my left ass-cheek is qualified to choose a long-distance phone plan.

No, wait. *apologizes to left ass-cheek for insulting it's inteligence*


people had something to say.

Apparently, Cindy Sheehan likes jail 

(ABC) Protestors ready for more death (via Drudge)

Cindy Sheehan, the military mother who made her son's death in Iraq a rallying point for the anti-war movement, plans to tie herself to the White House fence to protest the milestone of 2,000 U.S. military deaths in Iraq.

"I'm going to go to Washington, D.C. and I'm going to give a speech at the White House, and after I do, I'm going to tie myself to the fence and refuse to leave until they agree to bring our troops home," Sheehan said in a telephone interview last week as the milestone approached.
Good luck with that. While we Loyal Minions are sorry for the loss of your son, we have also (along with the rest of the sane members of society) have lost our patience for your lunacy. It won't solve diddly, so quit your moonbat tirades and STFU. We don't want to hear it, and we really don't have room in our jails for the likes of you. We are already busy filling them to twice capacity with people busted for possession or other nonsense.

"And I'll probably get arrested, and when I get out, I'll go back and do the same thing," she said.
Nice. We will sure to use that at your trial. Nothing like "flagrant violation and wanton disreguard for the law" to evoke a judge's sympathy. Care to add anything, like a death threat or something?

The death toll among U.S. military forces since the March 2003 invasion stood at 1,996 on Sunday.

The milestone's approach prompted plans for hundreds of other demonstrations across the United States, but for Sheehan, each military death in the Iraqi war has been a tragedy.

"To me, every single member since Number One has been tragic and needless and unnecessary," she said. "My son was somewhere around 615, and I've been working so hard for peace since my son was killed and now almost 1,400 more soldiers have been killed since Casey died."

Army Specialist Casey Sheehan was killed in Iraq on April 4, 2004.
Umm, every one of those brave soldiers gave their life in the defense of their nation. Maybe if she wasn't such a MoonBat Liberal and hellbent on spitting on everything that this great nation stands for, even with its problems, she would see that everytime she performs one of these little tirades or spews her vitriolic bile in public she actually tarnishes the reputation and the good name of her son, who died fighting for something he believed in. His job as a member of the United States Armed Forces is to go where he is told and justly fight his country's foe. He did this to the death, and should be commended for it.

Beyond Sheehan's plans, a candlelight vigil is planned at the White House to mourn the 2,000-death milestone. Hundreds of other demonstrations are scheduled for the day after the milestone number is reached.
Oh, the irony. I guarantee these same people are the ones saying "No blood for oil." The ones who think that everyone and their brother should go out and buy a Toyota Prius and dump their SUV in the nearest lake. So, how do they stage a protest?

*evil laugh*

Wikipedia has some great information about what those candles are made of. Any guesses where the materials came from to make those candles? It ain't corn, thats for sure. Dance little puppets, dance! *evil laugh*


"I hope that this milestone marks the point when the American people realize the U.S. military is not going to stop the violence in Iraq, and they instead start demanding a political solution to this problem," Sean O'Neill, a U.S. Marine who served in Iraq, said in a statement.
Oooh, a political solution. Now why didn't anyone think of that?

Oh, wait...Our friends at the Useless Nitwits tried that, and as predicted, it failed miserably. Meet my friend, Teddy Roosevelt: "Speak softly and carry a big stick." No, really. It has applicable meaning in everyday life. Now be a good boy and go stick your dick in a light socket, for the good of humanity and before you tarnish the good name of the Corps.


'HUMAN COST OF A LIE'

The American Friends Service Committee was helping coordinate activists to protest the Iraq war.

"On the day after the 2,000th reported U.S. military death in Iraq, people will gather in communities across the U.S. to say that the countries pro-peace majority wants Congress to stop the deaths by stopping the dollars that are funding the war," a coalition of anti-war groups said online at www.afsc.org.
Umm, yeah, right.

I ain't sure if I want what he is smoking or not...


people had something to say.

Well, no pictures, but... 

I did get a sporterized non-numbers-matching Mosin-Nagant. I dont know what model it is yet, but I will find out. It looks pretty nice, and was only $75.


people had something to say.

Friday, October 21, 2005

Well, its been a week... 

Since my last posting. Since then, I have been promoted to full time status with benefits, discovered my car is burning about 3 times more oil than it used to, and have a renewed sense of enthusiasm for firearms.

Therefore, I am going to Wanenmacher's Gun Show. I plan to take a camera and some good walking shoes. Hopefully, I will come back with a fuckton of cheap ammo and maybe even a Mosin-Nagant.

Wish me luck!


people had something to say.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Another painful reminder of why Marijuana should be legal 

American Veteran deported from Canada for drug charges in US

I am not going to quote the article, because then I would have to read it again. It involves being taken from the hospital while he still had a urine catheter in him and driven to the border, and spending days in jail with it still in. All for a drug crime.

Having had a catheter, all I can say is that I feel his pain. Literally; it hurt to type that out. It makes me want to smoke pot just thinking about it. Ow...


people had something to say.

Syrian leader talks out of his ass 

Syrian President Al-Assad brought to you by the Communist News Network and the Useless Nitwits
*snip*
Regarding Syria's eastern neighbor, Iraq, Al-Assad said the United States should re-examine its policy there because of the negative consequences of the war.
Yes, negative consequences like having all of your terrorist fucknuts citizens exterminated like the camel-humping semtex-vested dickheads that they are. "Negative consequences" is a bit of an understatement for "Open Season and No Bag Limit on terrorists." We have known for some time now that Syria is a terrorist-harboring nation. Nothing like getting what's coming to them, eh?

"We should re-evaluate what's going on in Iraq," he said.

"What did we achieve, what did they achieve from that war in Iraq," he asked. "It's a very simple question. What did they achieve economically, politically, fighting terrorism?
Umm, if you can't see the benifits in each of those catagories from fighting terror-mongers who seek the destruction of everything we hold dear, then I really can't debate the topic with you. It would be like trying to debate the benifits of breathing oxygen vs. doing without.

"We didn't achieve anything. This is one example."

When Amanpour suggested the U.S.-led war ousted Saddam Hussein, Al-Assad replied, "Yeah, but what did you lose as a return? The hope of the people, the stability, no better democracy, no better economy, no services, no stability in the region, more terrorism -- so is that the prize you've won for getting rid of a dictator? That's not a goal."
Rome wasn't built in a day, and building a peaceful society in a place that has known nothing but oppression and strife, with the added element of fanatics violently trying to stop the building of a free society, won't be easy. How did we lose the hope of the people? Millions rejoiced at Hussein's being deposed. They rejoiced when we captured him. Getting the ideas of democracy to be fully comprehended and lived out in a society like that takes time. Good economies must be built, they do not magically appear. And for someone like you to speak on the issue of stability when your country is responsible for those that seek to prevent a free Iraq is, is, well, you just need to shut the fuck up. How fucking dare you presume to speak about terrorism and stability in Iraq when you do nothing to prevent those that do your bidding, wether or not you order them to? Just remember, if you dont ship up, WE will ship your ass out. You obviously know what happened to the last Ba'athist puke that pissed us off...

Al-Assad's regime has faced sharp criticism from the United States, which has alleged the country shelters terrorist organizations and has failed to take measures to prevent fighters from crossing the border into Iraq.
He doesn't do anything about it because he supports it. Its known as the "turning a blind eye" play.

On Wednesday, President Bush called on Syria to be a "good neighbor" in the Middle East, warning Damascus against interfering in Lebanon and allowing insurgents to cross into Iraq.

"We're making good progress toward peace in the Holy Land, but one of the areas of concern is that foreign countries such as Syria might try to disrupt the peace process by encouraging terrorist activities," Bush said.

"We expect Syria to do everything in her power to shut down the transshipment of suiciders and killers into Iraq."
Translation: We know you are doing it, and you had better cut that shit out before we switch our gaze from Iran to Syria. You are a tiny pissant of a nation, and we WILL squash your ass like the bugs you are if you don't start handling shit on your end.

Al-Assad said that the United States cannot control its border with Mexico so Syria cannot be expected to keep people from sneaking into Iraq.
Fine, Syrian Douchebag: 1, Supporters of Freedom Everywhere: Infinity. We can't control our border because we are fighting the unwavering faithfulness of Bush to Vicente Fox, and terrorists and the scum that support them, such as yourself. But we are trying to fix that.

He said his country does not support people who kill Iraqis but he thinks there is a difference between terrorists and those who fight against American and British troops.
You know all the right things to say so that we get really pissed off. Keep it up...

He added that his country has asked Washington for technical support to monitor the Iraqi border better but ended its security cooperation with the United States recently because of repeated verbal attacks from the Bush administration.
Well, lets see: You support terrorists for decades, badmouth the US at every turn, and say that the people killing brave American and British soldiers fighting for the freedom of Iraqi citizens are not terrorists. And then you ask us for help in controlling your border. Uhh huh...You're dumber than you look, aren't you? Ever seen the fury of a hundred-thousand well-armed and well-trained Americans? You seem to be begging for it.

The interview was conducted just before the news of the suicide of Ghazi Kanaan, Syria's interior minister who led the country's military intelligence in Lebanon for nearly 20 years.

Kanaan died in a Damascus hospital of a gunshot wound to the head, according to the interior ministry and other government ministers.

The official was among those interviewed by a German prosecutor heading the U.N. investigation into Hariri's death.
Yeah, right. Just like all those former Soviet Chairmen that died from a headcold.

And an article bashing the US from a UN investigator? I am shocked, shocked I tell you. Umm, one thing does puzzle me though: What the fuck is a German prosecutor investigating a death for the UN doing writing articles for CNN?


people had something to say.

A need to rant... 

Once again on campus, it is Crosswalk Safety Awareness Day. And once again, I think freshmen need to pass a Life Skills 101 class before progressing on to higher level classes. Learn how to cook more than Ramen, how to separate your whites and colors, and HOW TO FUCKING LOOK WHEN CROSSING THE STREET!!! I shit you not, I have seen more people walk from sidewalk to crosswalk while talking on the phone or whatever, and NEVER BREAK THEIR GODDAMNED STRIDE!!! They never looked! At least deer fucking look at you! These people think that those little white stripes guarantee their safety! Just because they are within 10 yards of a crosswalk does not mean that we automatically notice them and follow their every move, just ready to stop for them! They haven't thought about the physics of their predicament; how their 90-180lb body is bug compared to a 3000lb vehicle, or a 28,000lb bus! Did someone equip all vehicles with an inertia-removal button and not tell me?

(screams) These people make me want to leap out of my car and beat some sense into them. Maybe if I hit one or two, people will take notice...


people had something to say.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

One small step for freedom, one giant leap for blogging kind... 

Delaware Supreme Court says that blogger's anonymity is safe

Its good to know that there is now legal precedent to back me up if I say that some politician (or most) that I mention by name is (insert situation appropriate slurs and insults).
At issue was a defamation lawsuit filed last year by Patrick Cahill, a councilman in Smyrna, Del. Mr. Cahill said he needed the identity of a blogger who in a September 2004 posting praised the mayor but said Mr. Cahill was divisive and had "an obvious mental deterioration."

In a second posting, the blogger, named John Doe in the suit, wrote that Mr. Cahill "is as paranoid as everyone in the town thinks he is," according to court records.

That's it? WTF? That's the most velvet-gloved derogatory thing I have ever read about a politician in a blog! If ever a man needed slapped! Can I be sued for saying that this lily-livered yellow-bellied mentally-deteriorated cur's mother wears combat boots? Can I be sued for libel or defamation for saying that this man is a sissy? Cry-baby? Wuss? How about DumbAss? If he had ignored the blogger or said that "he is entitled to his opinion", he wouldn't look so foolish.
In a 33-page opinion, the five justices reversed the lower court, saying the judge used a standard that was incorrect because it was not stringent enough. The court said, "The Internet provides a means of communication where a person wronged by statements of an anonymous poster can respond instantly, can respond to the alleged defamatory statements on the same site or blog, and thus, can, almost contemporaneously, respond to the same audience that initially read the allegedly defamatory statements."

Well, they can, but they often don't. And, while I agree with the general ruling, where is the bit about the right to express your opinion?

David Finger, the blogger's lawyer, said: "Statements on an electronic bulletin board with hyperbole and profanity are generally not considered as credible sources of facts. The court found that people who read these types of blogs cannot reasonably expect them to be anything more than the writer's opinion."

Some of us who give our opinions do occasionally report factual stories, and by saying that we aren't credible hurts us in the long run. But, not many will see this ruling, they will just hear that some DE court ruled infavor of a blogger publishing his opinion.


people had something to say.

Opinions are like... 

Brits try to outlaw religious opinions

Mr Clarke recently said he wanted to stop "nasty and extreme behaviour" which destroyed individuals and divided communities.
Well, just how many ways can that be defined? I love a good law with based completly upon subjectivity...

"This is not just about doctrine. This is not even about theological opposition. This is about our basic freedom to speak and to preach.

"It affects people's freedom to discuss and to critique anything because it might upset or offend somebody else and that is very serious."
Astonishing. Thoughtcrime, anyone? Who would enforce this?

From Wikipedia:
The term "Thought Police", by extension, has come to refer to real or perceived enforcement of ideological correctness in any modern or historical contexts.

The more I think about it, the more I think Orwell wasn't a fiction-writing author. Instead, I start seeing marked similarities in style and impact with his writings and those of Nostradamus.


Political correctness is intellectual fascism.


people had something to say.

What is this lunacy? 

Lobbyists in charge of establishing hierarchy of needs instead of experts

Ok, lets just put aside the fact that most lobbyists shouldn't be in charge of their own bowels, because it inevitibly ends up in some federal trash known as a "law". Now we are putting them directly in charge of making sure people are prioritized according to their needs, before the shit hits the fan? Words do not begin to describe...

Two lobbying groups, chosen by Louisiana to collect emergency requests from hospitals and nursing homes during Hurricane Katrina, found themselves instead scrambling to arrange private rescues when government teams became preoccupied with plucking citizens off rooftops.

The inability to quickly direct National Guard and other government rescue teams to health care facilities had deadly consequences.
Poor planning begets poor results. Millionares aren't made overnight, not even lotto winners. Someone had to set the whole thing up, and the winners have to keep plugging away at it.

Dozens of fragile patients died in sweltering heat and other taxing conditions that lasted for days.

That will happen when the elderly stay inside of well-insulated, sun-exposed buildings without air conditioning in SOUTH LOUISIANA!!! This is why experts, not lobbyists, need to be at the forefront of disaster planning, so that people will realize that geriatrics need A/C in the South, and that hurricanes usually take out the power that supplies that A/C. You know, people with COMMON FUCKING SENSE!!!

"We are an advocacy organization on behalf of hospitals. Overnight we turned into a hospital emergency center," Louisiana Hospital Association president John Matessino said, summing up how his group rose to rescue coordination amid the chaos.

Some are now asking why lobbyists, instead of emergency experts, were left to devise life-and-death solutions by patching together church and tour buses, private ambulances and religious volunteers.
I think everyone needs to be asking that. Smart people do not put vampires in charge of a blood bank; likewise, good government officials do not put inexperienced windbags in charge of life-and-death situations.

The state gave both the Louisiana Nursing Home Association and the Louisiana Hospital Association permanent seats at the state emergency operations center in Baton Rouge and trained them to track health facility needs and relay information to authorities who would dispatch the help.

But that plan disintegrated under the magnitude of Katrina's destruction, leaving the lobbying groups to scramble to find private alternatives when government rescuers couldn't get to facilities.
It sounds like a good plan, but when you dont have the right people's ears, the most useful information will go unheeded. I could see them being put in charge of listing supply needs or supplying data to the experts on how many cases of what type are most often in the hospitals and nursing homes, but not putting them in charge of implementing or devising a plan. Once again, we see that governments, no matter how small or large, must have people die to learn their lesson. And then it doesn't always work.

"The priority mission was picking people off of rooftops and out of water," said state Health Officer Jimmy Guidry, the main contact for the hospital and nursing home lobbies in the Louisiana disaster center.
Well, that is all fine and good, but the priority BEFORE THE FUCKING STORM was to get all the people out that couldn't do so under their own power in facilities that were being paid to ensure their patients' welfare. This is why even public schools have a plan of some kind to ensure the well-being of kids during tornadoes. Ugghh.

Guidry said he argued for nursing home and hospital requests but "it seemed like forever to get all the transportation that was being asked for."

Louisiana emergency operations spokesman Mark Smith said the choice boiled down to "if the water is about to come over the roof of someone's house do they have a need greater than the elderly person lying in their bed in the nursing home? ... They're not about to die because they're about to get swept away by a flood."
No, they will just bake to death and be eaten by mosquitoes.

PPP: Piss Poor Planning. No other explanation.


people had something to say.