Saturday, June 19, 2004
Just one more reason to go to war with Iraq
Putin: Russia warned U.S. of Iraq terror:
I wonder how quickly this will be spun by the media, and how quickly it will be forgotten by the left. Their arguement for not going to war is quickly crumbling beneath them, being broken by the Jackhammers of Truth™.
people had something to say.
I wonder how quickly this will be spun by the media, and how quickly it will be forgotten by the left. Their arguement for not going to war is quickly crumbling beneath them, being broken by the Jackhammers of Truth™.
"Russian President Vladimir Putin said his country warned the United States several times that Saddam Hussein's regime was planning terror attacks on the United States and its overseas interests.So, not only does our government declare the need for war against Sodamned Insane and Iraq based on terrorism, a nation who holds an ardently opposing view to the war also says that Iraq was planning attacks against us. Hmmmm...
Putin's comments in Kazakhstan came amid a new debate in the United States about the extent of ties between Saddam and the al Qaeda terrorist network triggered by a preliminary report from the commission investigating the September 11 attacks.
'I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received ... information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations,' Putin said.
The Russian leader did not elaborate on any details of the warnings of terror plots or mention whether they were tied to the al Qaeda terror network.Well, if you had as much common sense as the Russian people probably think you do, you would know that you don't wait for the bulldog to attack you, you shoot it while its running, snarling, and growling at you and your kids. In the end, you have a dead dog, kids still in one peice, and everyone is better off for it.
Putin, one of the strongest critics of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, also said Russia had no information that Saddam's regime had actually committed any terrorist acts."
people had something to say.
The EU Constitution was ratified last week...
EU Constitution Draft section 2
I heard that the EU constitution was ratified last week, and wanted to know exactly what was in it. I see the EU in several different lights:
1. They will most likely be a Socialist's Only Club who likes to hear themselves speak, much like the Useless Nincompoops.
2. They could become active enough to be the next Soviet Union, although I doubt that because they have had lots of bloodshed over there, and we cleaned up most of it. And they know that we could go over there and kick their ass whenever we pleased. Its not difficult to conquer the disarmed, much like Hitler found out with the Jews. By that, I mean that once we wiped out their military, their citizenry couldn't put up much of a fight (sans Switzerland, but that is terrible terrain for a war anyway) because 90% of their firearms were removed from their possession, and the other 10% have to have need shown to the government to own them, and then they must be locked up separate from ammo, and broken down. Often, they must be stored at a gun club. A pack of Girl Scouts armed with Sporks could take over France, without much effort.
3. A body of blowhards that will fall apart because no one can come to an agreement about a future issue, and collapse/civil war breaks out in the EU.
So, I really dont fear them, unless the whole of the EU experiences economic collapse like 1920's Germany, and we all know what came out of that.
*WARNING*: The following is not only legnthy, but also rife with Nanny-statism.
Anyway, I copied some relavant parts of "Rights" allowed by the EU to its citizens:
Notice this part as well. The first part has been italicized for emphasis.
I would love to fisk this whole thing, but it would take forever and would be longer than a football field. So I will leave you to your own devices.
people had something to say.
I heard that the EU constitution was ratified last week, and wanted to know exactly what was in it. I see the EU in several different lights:
1. They will most likely be a Socialist's Only Club who likes to hear themselves speak, much like the Useless Nincompoops.
2. They could become active enough to be the next Soviet Union, although I doubt that because they have had lots of bloodshed over there, and we cleaned up most of it. And they know that we could go over there and kick their ass whenever we pleased. Its not difficult to conquer the disarmed, much like Hitler found out with the Jews. By that, I mean that once we wiped out their military, their citizenry couldn't put up much of a fight (sans Switzerland, but that is terrible terrain for a war anyway) because 90% of their firearms were removed from their possession, and the other 10% have to have need shown to the government to own them, and then they must be locked up separate from ammo, and broken down. Often, they must be stored at a gun club. A pack of Girl Scouts armed with Sporks could take over France, without much effort.
3. A body of blowhards that will fall apart because no one can come to an agreement about a future issue, and collapse/civil war breaks out in the EU.
So, I really dont fear them, unless the whole of the EU experiences economic collapse like 1920's Germany, and we all know what came out of that.
*WARNING*: The following is not only legnthy, but also rife with Nanny-statism.
Anyway, I copied some relavant parts of "Rights" allowed by the EU to its citizens:
TITLE II
FREEDOMS
Article II-6
Right to liberty and security
Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
Article II-7
Respect for private and family life
Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.
Article II-8
Protection of personal data
1. Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.
2. Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law. Everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified.
3. Compliance with these rules shall be subject to control by an independent authority.
Article II-9
Right to marry and right to found a family
The right to marry and the right to found a family shall be guaranteed in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of these rights.
Article II-10
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes freedom to change religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or in private, to manifest religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
2. The right to conscientious objection is recognised, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of this right.
Article II-11
Freedom of expression and information
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
2. The freedom and pluralism of the media shall be respected.
Article II-12
Freedom of assembly and of association
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association at all levels, in particular in political, trade union and civic matters, which implies the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his or her interests.
2. Political parties at Union level contribute to expressing the political will of the citizens of the Union.
Article II-13
Freedom of the arts and sciences
The arts and scientific research shall be free of constraint. Academic freedom shall be respected.
Article II-14
Right to education
1. Everyone has the right to education and to have access to vocational and continuing training.
2. This right includes the possibility to receive free compulsory education.
3. The freedom to found educational establishments with due respect for democratic principles and the right of parents to ensure the education and teaching of their children in conformity with their religious, philosophical and pedagogical convictions shall be respected, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of such freedom and right.
Article II-15
Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work
1. Everyone has the right to engage in work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted
occupation.
2. Every citizen of the Union has the freedom to seek employment, to work, to exercise the right of establishment and to provide services in any Member State.
3. Nationals of third countries who are authorised to work in the territories of the Member States are entitled to working conditions equivalent to those of citizens of the Union.
Article II-16
Freedom to conduct a business
The freedom to conduct a business in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices is recognised.
Article II-17
Right to property
1. Everyone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions. No one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss. The use of property may be regulated by law insofar as is necessary for the general interest. (In other words, the use of your property may be legislated in the interests of protection, "for thechildrencitizenry," or may be removed from your possession completely. You don't need that car that goes over 100kph, so we are taking it off your hands "for the citizenry." Safety, and all that.)
2. Intellectual property shall be protected.
Article II-18
Right to asylum
The right to asylum shall be guaranteed with due respect for the rules of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees and in accordance with the Constitution.
(You people need to be thrown in an asylum.)
Article II-19
Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition
1. Collective expulsions are prohibited.
2. No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
TITLE III
EQUALITY
Article II-20
Equality before the law
Everyone is equal before the law.
Article II-21
Non-discrimination
1. Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.
2. Within the scope of application of the Constitution and without prejudice to any of its specific provisions, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.
Article II-22
Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity
The Union shall respect cultural, religious and linguistic diversity.
Article II-23
Equality between men and women
Equality between men and women must be ensured in all areas, including employment, work and pay.
The principle of equality shall not prevent the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under-represented sex.
Article II-24
The rights of the child
1. Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being.
They may express their views freely. Such views shall be taken into consideration on matters which concern them in accordance with their age and maturity.
2. In all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration.
3. Every child shall have the right to maintain on a regular basis a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests. (According to whom? The government?)
Article II-25
The rights of the elderly
The Union recognises and respects the rights of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and
independence and to participate in social and cultural life.
Article II-26
Integration of persons with disabilities
The Union recognises and respects the right of persons with disabilities to benefit from measures designed to ensure their independence, social and occupational integration and participation in the life of the community.
TITLE IV
SOLIDARITY
Article II-27
Workers' right to information and consultation within the undertaking
Workers or their representatives must, at the appropriate levels, be guaranteed information and consultation in good time in the cases and under the conditions provided for by Union law and national laws and practices.
Article II-28
Right of collective bargaining and action
Workers and employers, or their respective organisations, have, in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices, the right to negotiate and conclude collective agreements at the appropriate levels and, in cases of conflicts of interest, to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action.
Article II-29
Right of access to placement services
Everyone has the right of access to a free placement service.
Article II-30
Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal
Every worker has the right to protection against unjustified dismissal, in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices.
Article II-31
Fair and just working conditions
1. Every worker has the right to working conditions which respect his or her health, safety and dignity.
2. Every worker has the right to limitation of maximum working hours, to daily and weekly
rest periods and to an annual period of paid leave.
Article II-32
Prohibition of child labour and protection of young people at work
The employment of children is prohibited. The minimum age of admission to employment may not be lower than the minimum school- leaving age, without prejudice to such rules as may be more favourable to young people and except for limited derogations.
Young people admitted to work must have working conditions appropriate to their age and be protected against economic exploitation and any work likely to harm their safety, health or physical, mental, moral or social development or to interfere with their education.
Article II-33
Family and professional life
1. The family shall enjoy legal, economic and social protection.
2. To reconcile family and professional life, everyone shall have the right to protection from dismissal for a reason connected with maternity and the right to paid maternity leave and to parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child.
Article II-34
Social security and social assistance
1. The Union recognises and respects the entitlement to social security benefits and social services providing protection in cases such as maternity, illness, industrial accidents, dependency or old age, and in the case of loss of employment, in accordance with the rules laid down by Union law and national laws and practices.
2. Everyone residing and moving legally within the European Union is entitled to social security benefits and social advantages in accordance with Union law and national laws and practices.
3. In order to combat social exclusion and poverty, the Union recognises and respects the right to social and housing assistance so as to ensure a decent existence for all those who lack sufficient resources, in accordance with the rules laid down by Union law and national laws and practices. (Entitlements? WTF? So I could fly over there and just mooch off the EU for the rest of my days?)
Article II-35
Health care
Everyone has the right of access to preventive health care and the right to benefit from medical treatment under the conditions established by national laws and practices. A high level of human health protection shall be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities.
Article II-36
Access to services of general economic interest
The Union recognises and respects access to services of general economic interest as provided for in national laws and practices, in accordance with the Constitution, in order to promote the social and territorial cohesion of the Union.
Article II-37
Environmental protection
A high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment must be integrated into the policies of the Union and ensured in accordance with the principle of sustainable development.
Article II-38
Consumer protection
Union policies shall ensure a high level of consumer protection.
TITLE V
CITIZENS' RIGHTS
Article II-39
Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament
1. Every citizen of the Union has the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament in the Member State in which he or she resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State.
2. Members of the European Parliament shall be elected by direct universal suffrage in a free and secret ballot.
Article II-40
Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections
Every citizen of the Union has the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections in the Member State in which he or she resides under the same conditions as nationals of that State.
Article II-41
Right to good administration
1. Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union.
2. This right includes:
(a) the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken;
(b) the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate interests of confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy;
(c) the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions.
3. Every person has the right to have the Union make good any damage caused by its institutions or by its servants in the performance of their duties, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States.
4. Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the official languages of the Union and must have an answer in the same language.
Article II-42
Right of access to documents
Any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union, in whatever form they are produced.
Article II-43
Ombudsman
Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the institutions, bodies or agencies of the Union, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role.
Article II-44
Right to petition
Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to petition the European Parliament.
Article II-45
Freedom of movement and of residence
1. Every citizen of the Union has the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.
2. Freedom of movement and residence may be granted, in accordance with the Constitution, to nationals of third countries legally resident in the territory of a Member State.
Article II-46
Diplomatic and consular protection
Every citizen of the Union shall, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which he or she is a national is not represented, be entitled to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of any Member State, on the same conditions as the nationals of that Member State.
TITLE VI
JUSTICE
Article II-47
Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
Everyone whose rights and fr eedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.
Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an ind ependent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented. Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources insofar as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.
Article II-48
Presumption of innocence and right of defence
1. Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
2. Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.
Article II-49
Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties
1. No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than that which was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed. If, subsequent to the commission of a criminal offence, the law provides for a lighter penalty, that penalty shall be applicable.
2. This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles recognised by the community of nations.
3. The severity of penalties must not be disproportionate to the criminal offence.
Article II-50
Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same
criminal offence. No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for an offence for which he or she has already been finally acquitted or convicted within the Union in accordance with the law.
Notice this part as well. The first part has been italicized for emphasis.
Article II-52
Scope of guaranteed rights
1. Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.
(So, if the EU government decides that a right you have today is bad for the EU tomorrow, they can revoke it "for thechildrencitizens." This is a place that I want NO part of.)
2. Rights recognised by this Charter for which provision is made in other Parts of the
Constitution shall be exercised under the conditions and within the limits defined by these relevant Parts
3. Insofar as this Charter contains rights which correspond to rights guaranteed by the
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the meaning and scope of those rights shall be the same as those laid down by the said Convention. This provision shall not prevent Union law providing more extensive protection.
4. Insofar as this Charter recognises fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, those rights shall be interpreted in harmony with those traditions.
5. The provisions of this Charter which contain principles may be implemented by legislative and executive acts taken by institutions and bodies of the Union, and by acts of Member States when they are implementing Union law, in the exercise of their respective powers. They shall be judicially cognisable only in the interpretation of such acts and in the ruling on their legality.
6. Full account shall be taken of national laws and practices as specified in this Charter.
I would love to fisk this whole thing, but it would take forever and would be longer than a football field. So I will leave you to your own devices.
people had something to say.
I really dont know what to make of this...
Clinton defends successor's push for war:
I am aboslutely stunned to see this on the Communist News Network's™ website. I have a box of .45acp that says it never gets more than a 15sec blurb on any network other than Fox though.
people had something to say.
I am aboslutely stunned to see this on the Communist News Network's™ website. I have a box of .45acp that says it never gets more than a 15sec blurb on any network other than Fox though.
"'I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over,' Clinton said in a Time magazine interview that will hit newsstands Monday, a day before the publication of his bookThat's awful nice of him. I wonder how the Lefties are going to take that from their hero.'My Life''Mein Lieben.'
Clinton, who was interviewed Thursday, said he did not believe that Bush went to war in Iraq over oil or for imperialist reasons but out of a genuine belief that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction remained unaccounted for.
Noting that Bush had to be 'reeling' in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001, Clinton said Bush's first priority was to keep al Qaeda and other terrorist networks from obtaining 'chemical and biological weapons or small amounts of fissile material.'What really pisses me off about this article is how it goes on to mention the Abu Grahib stuff, even though another guy had his head hacked off by the Terrorist Savages™.
'That's why I supported the Iraq thing. There was a lot of stuff unaccounted for,' Clinton said in reference to Iraq and the fact that U.N. weapons inspectors left the country in 1998.
'So I thought the president had an absolute responsibility to go to the U.N. and say, 'Look, guys, after 9/11, you have got to demand that Saddam Hussein lets us finish the inspection process.' You couldn't responsibly ignore [the possibility that] a tyrant had these stocks,' Clinton said.
people had something to say.
Friday, June 18, 2004
Wont this piss India off?
Pakistan officially declared "non-NATO" ally by US
Ok, I dont know much about central-southern Asia, but I do know that India and Pakistan aren't exactly the best of friends. Won't they be somewhat...displeased?
people had something to say.
Ok, I dont know much about central-southern Asia, but I do know that India and Pakistan aren't exactly the best of friends. Won't they be somewhat...displeased?
people had something to say.
Fascinating. Hezbollah wants to help Michael Moore out...
Drudgery: Hezbollah wants to help the Michelin Man
Heh. You know what they say, "Birds of a kind, flock together..."
people had something to say.
Meanwhile, in the United Arab Emirates, the film is being offered the kind of support it doesn't need. According to Screen International, the UAE-based distributor Front Row Entertainment has been contacted by organisations related to the Hezbollah in Lebanon with offers of help.
Heh. You know what they say, "Birds of a kind, flock together..."
people had something to say.
It seems like we have a bit of a contradiction...
Drudgery: sKerry: 9/11 Report Casts Doubt on Iraq War
Bush keeps insisting that there is a connection between Al-Queda and Iraq. Waffles says that there is no connection, and uses the report of the 9/11 commission (not exactly the least biased group on Earth) to prove his point.
However, it seems that the Clinton Administration thought differently. And we all know how the Democratic party loves to fellate Bill Clinton, their most heralded leader of all time. *spit*
Ok, so its a weak link, but enough for the Clinton Administration to call the man out. Also, it wasn't the main arguement of the indictment, only that he was a terrorist fuck-nugget who had better die or show up for us to convict him. Too bad in the Clinton DOJ he would probably be out by now if he were thrown in jail in 1999.
The point is: Now that it is known that not only is the sKerry-ites's worst enemy (Bush) saying there was a link, but the sKerry-ites's best friend also said there was a link. So what is one to do when his best friend and worst enemy are telling him the same thing?
Well, in Kerry's case, he will probably ignore it. We all know the tendencies of Democrats to ignore any bit of logic they happen to stumble accross. Just ask any politically active gun-owner. Facts are useless to Dems.
*EDIT*: It seems that it wasn't mentioned or reported widely that Clinton supports Bush in his efforts in Iraq.
But then again, the article also states that Clinton didn't have the chance for OBL's head on a platter supposedly offered by the Sudanese. I personally call bullshit on that one. YMMV.
*EDIT AGAIN* Well, apparently NRO has already had a write-up of the connection, using the same resources I did. But probably not through Drudge. Found via Instapundit.
people had something to say.
Bush keeps insisting that there is a connection between Al-Queda and Iraq. Waffles says that there is no connection, and uses the report of the 9/11 commission (not exactly the least biased group on Earth) to prove his point.
From the link above:
"DETROIT (AP) - Democratic presidential challenger John Kerry said Thursday that the Sept. 11 commission's report clearly shows President Bush ``rushed to war for a purpose that it now turns out is not supported by the facts.''
"Kerry seized upon the commission's findings as further evidence that the White House misled the public about its reasons for invading Iraq. He said Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney ``on a number of occasions have asserted very directly to the American people that the war against al-Qaida is the war in Iraq. And on any number of occasions the president has made it clear that the front of the war against al-Qaida is in Iraq.''
``This administration took its eye off of al-Qaida, took its eye off of the real war on terror in Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan and transferred it for reasons of its own to Iraq,'' Kerry said. ``And the American people are paying billions of dollars now because of that decision. And most importantly, American families and American soldiers are paying the highest price of all.'' "
However, it seems that the Clinton Administration thought differently. And we all know how the Democratic party loves to fellate Bill Clinton, their most heralded leader of all time. *spit*
From the Clinton link above:
"Additionally, the indictment states that Al Qaeda reached an agreement with Iraq not to work against the regime of Saddam Hussein and that they would work cooperatively with Iraq, particularly in weapons development."
From the indictment of Osama Bin Laden, put out by the Clinton Justice Department
"4. Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezballah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."
Ok, so its a weak link, but enough for the Clinton Administration to call the man out. Also, it wasn't the main arguement of the indictment, only that he was a terrorist fuck-nugget who had better die or show up for us to convict him. Too bad in the Clinton DOJ he would probably be out by now if he were thrown in jail in 1999.
The point is: Now that it is known that not only is the sKerry-ites's worst enemy (Bush) saying there was a link, but the sKerry-ites's best friend also said there was a link. So what is one to do when his best friend and worst enemy are telling him the same thing?
Well, in Kerry's case, he will probably ignore it. We all know the tendencies of Democrats to ignore any bit of logic they happen to stumble accross. Just ask any politically active gun-owner. Facts are useless to Dems.
*EDIT*: It seems that it wasn't mentioned or reported widely that Clinton supports Bush in his efforts in Iraq.
The interview also covered the war in Iraq, which was not mentioned in yesterday's excerpts. Rather said Clinton was "supportive" of President Bush on Iraq and that "it will surprise some people."
But then again, the article also states that Clinton didn't have the chance for OBL's head on a platter supposedly offered by the Sudanese. I personally call bullshit on that one. YMMV.
*EDIT AGAIN* Well, apparently NRO has already had a write-up of the connection, using the same resources I did. But probably not through Drudge. Found via Instapundit.
people had something to say.
Thursday, June 17, 2004
This is the kind of example of Islam that we need to be seeing...
Saudi friend asks captors to free American:
This is a good example of how people of any religion can be a good person, and that just because a small minority of people are exercising some screwed up view of a religious text is no reason to curse the many because of the few.
people had something to say.
"'I declare that I pledged to protect this man,' said Saad al-Mu'men, a pseudonym for the colleague, who wrote a letter that appeared on radical Islamist Web sites. The letter -- and an interview with him -- was posted later on the Al Arabiya news channel's Web site. In his letter, al-Mu'men told the kidnappers that if Johnson is harmed, 'I will never forgive you. I will curse you in all my prayers.' He cited the prophet Mohammed in his letter: 'If they were granted [Muslim]protection, then killing or taking their money or harming them is forbidden.' In the interview, al-Mu'men said, 'I addressed the letter to the kidnappers, and I told them that I have earned him holy protection. I asked them to follow the teachings of Islam and God's law rather than their own personal interests. 'If they are true believers, they will release him after reading my letter."
This is a good example of how people of any religion can be a good person, and that just because a small minority of people are exercising some screwed up view of a religious text is no reason to curse the many because of the few.
people had something to say.
Wednesday, June 16, 2004
There are somethings too good to pass up...
I got this from Right Wing News who got it from Drudge. I usually dont go for the childish antics of the Dems, but in this case it is too funny not to share.
people had something to say.
people had something to say.
Tuesday, June 15, 2004
Discover.Com--Anything Into Oil
Via AlphaPatriotCarbon-based Anything Into Oil:
Hell, farming states could be the Texas of the 21st century!
people had something to say.
"Early in 2003, company officials predicted that the Carthage plant, which will process guts, feathers, bones, and blood from a nearby ConAgra Foods Butterball Turkey slaughterhouse, would be cranking at full capacity that summer, making 500 barrels of high-quality fuel oil daily. Brian Appel, Changing World Technologies chairman and CEO, says several unique challenges have delayed the full-scale operation of the $20 million Carthage facility. The principal setback, he says, was faulty workmanship in the construction of the processing equipment, requiring X-rays of 5,000 welds and the repair of more than 1,000 of those checked. That alone pushed us back six to nine months. We are currently involved in a legal action against that contractor, Appel says. Other shakedown adjustments included calibrating the first-stage grinder, adding a biofilter to control odors, tweaking computerized flow controls, and building additional equipment between the first and second stages. "When I first read about this, I was absolutely fascinated. Think about it. If you put one of these things at every major city and farming community, we could supply lots of our own oil, reducing the dependence on foriegn supplies. And if we need more, we build more plants and start creating more organic waste to be converted.
Hell, farming states could be the Texas of the 21st century!
people had something to say.
The evil fucks we fought against...
To Saddam's prisoners, US abuse seems 'a joke':
You know, I dont usually blog about the Iraq war, as there are so many other good comentaries on the subject. But this I could not let go unheard.
Would any of you like to argue that Saddam didn't need removed by the benevolent UN who strives for human rights and equality, and how evil Bush is for removing him?
people had something to say.
You know, I dont usually blog about the Iraq war, as there are so many other good comentaries on the subject. But this I could not let go unheard.
"If Idrissi seems a bit callous about the fate of the Iraqis in US-run jails, he has probably earned the right to differ. He recalls a day in 1982, at the General Security prison in Baghdad:
'They called all the prisoners out to the courtyard for what they called a 'celebration.' We all knew what they meant by 'celebration.' All the prisoners were chained to a pipe that ran the length of the courtyard wall. One prisoner, Amer al-Tikriti, was called out. They said if he didn't tell them everything they wanted to know, they would show him torture like he had never seen. He merely told them he would show them patience like they had never seen.'
'This is when they brought out his wife, who was five months pregnant. One of the guards said that if he refused to talk he would get 12 guards to rape his wife until she lost the baby. Amer said nothing. So they did. We were forced to watch. Whenever one of us cast down his eyes, they would beat us.'
'Amer's wife didn't lose the baby. So the guard took a knife, cut her belly open and took the baby out with his hands. The woman and child died minutes later. Then the guard used the same knife to cut Amer's throat. There is a moment of silence. Then Idrissi says: "What we have seen about the recent abuse at Abu Ghraib is a joke to us.""
Would any of you like to argue that Saddam didn't need removed by the benevolent UN who strives for human rights and equality, and how evil Bush is for removing him?
people had something to say.
Monday, June 14, 2004
CBS aids in the quest for determining the political leanings of media stations...
Drudgery: CBS requires all affiliate radio stations to carry advertisment for Clinton's book
I always knew their political leanings. Now anyone who says different is just deluding themselves.
people had something to say.
I always knew their political leanings. Now anyone who says different is just deluding themselves.
people had something to say.
Edwards top 2nd choice for Kerry
Edwards is top pick among possible Kerry running mates
You know, I hate to break it to Edwards, or anyone that Kerry chooses, but ole' Waffles has already made his first choice, and his first choice turned him down.
Hopefully, that finished McCain's career in the senate. He trashed the 1st Amendment with the Campaign Finance Reform Act, tried to screw up gunshows, and has just been a RINO in general. The citizens of Arizona need a real Republican, not one who will go with the winds like Bill Clinton.
people had something to say.
You know, I hate to break it to Edwards, or anyone that Kerry chooses, but ole' Waffles has already made his first choice, and his first choice turned him down.
Hopefully, that finished McCain's career in the senate. He trashed the 1st Amendment with the Campaign Finance Reform Act, tried to screw up gunshows, and has just been a RINO in general. The citizens of Arizona need a real Republican, not one who will go with the winds like Bill Clinton.
people had something to say.
Sunday, June 13, 2004
Los Angeles name too godly for U.S.?
WorldNetDaily: Los Angeles name too godly for U.S.?
Some things can just be taken do Goddamned far. Oh, shit, now I have gone and done it. The ACLU is going to come after my ass for invoking the name of God in my public blog.
First, it was the cross in LA's seal. Now, its their name. And SanFran's name. And SanDiego's name. And...And...And...
What is up with the ACLU's anti-Christian crusade, anyway? I am not religious, but for crying out loud, chill the fuck out!
people had something to say.
Some things can just be taken do Goddamned far. Oh, shit, now I have gone and done it. The ACLU is going to come after my ass for invoking the name of God in my public blog.
First, it was the cross in LA's seal. Now, its their name. And SanFran's name. And SanDiego's name. And...And...And...
What is up with the ACLU's anti-Christian crusade, anyway? I am not religious, but for crying out loud, chill the fuck out!
people had something to say.
Students don't care about politics
Students Found Apathetic About Politics:
And another thing: just when did this country, our Republic, become a democracy? I don't want anyone to belive in democracy. I want no part of "Mob Rule." I suggest a test for office holding, one of the pass/fail questions being "The United States of America is:
A. A Democracy, where every citizen has a say in government.
B. A Constitutional Republic, where every citizen votes for their leaders.
I think it would save us alot of trouble.
people had something to say.
"SEASIDE, Calif. -- Most college students doubt that voting in presidential elections will make major changes in American society, according to a nationwide survey.Well duh. What difference will it make? You vote for one guy who barks retoric that you detest less than the other guy's vile, putrid sludge spewing from his mouth. Honestly, what difference will it make? I am going to vote, and my vote wont make a difference, but I can sleep better at night voting the way I will. Besides, who the fuck believes that the President is in charge of making sweeping changes? He doesn't create jobs, he doesn't control the economy or prices of commodities (like gasoline), and doesn't do a lot of shit. BECAUSE IT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF HIS POWER, both Constitutionally and whatever script the .gov follows now. The POTUS has no magic wand, the press just wants you to believe he does and refuses to use it when things go bad.
Only 35 percent of the students surveyed said presidential voting will create 'a lot of change,' compared to 47 percent who thought so in March 2001, according to the poll conducted for the Leon and Sylvia Panetta Institute, a public-policy think tank at the California State University, Monterey Bay.Could this be because 9/11 woke them up to the fact that shit outside of the POTUS's control, as well as outside of any college student's control, and hell, out of the fucking military's control, happens everyday?
The survey also found that only 19 percent of American college students believe that politics is 'very relevant' to their lives, and 43 percent believe that politics has little or no relevance.Yes. Almost half of "The Leaders of Tomorrow" believe that politics, the very driving force behind that vast cesspool of inefficiency known as the District of Colombia, will have no relevance. Well, they are somewhat right. Relevant enough that you can do something about it? Not really. You can campaign for the candidate of your choice, believing that he/she will do the right thing and not be sucked in to that retched hive of scum and villainy with any shred of their dignity, conscience, or values intact, but in 95% of the cases (and that is a generous estimate, that 5%) it doesn't matter. Your candidate will sell out at least once, on at least one of your pet values. But fear not, for it is merely the status quo. You can write to your reps and senators, and you will get a form letter back, stating what a fucktard you are for having your opinion and wanting them to actually think the issue through and see some fucking logic instead of fellating those who give them campaign contributions and bleating the position of those contributors. Its the fucking money they care about, not your piddly-assed vote. Unless its campaign season, then they will spin an intricate web of lies and deciet for you to swallow whole about how they had to compromise on an issue so that a more important one would get through. Well, that wont work with me. Try having a fucking backbone, and standing on your Goddamned principles.
'Somehow the message isn't getting through,' said Leon Panetta, the institute's director and former chief of staff to President Clinton.Who the fuck cares what you think?
Despite pressing issues such as the economy and the war in Iraq, students often are turned off by politics, Panetta said.Actually, I am very civic minded. I sure as fuck didn't get that way from my teachers. I got that way from taking a look around and saying "HOLY SHIT! How the bloody hell did we get in this mess? Who the fuck put those dimwitted assmongers incharge, and why? Why didn't they see what stupid shit they would do in office, see through the propoganda fed to them, and vote in in someone competent?!?! Whodathunk that competency might be necessary to do the fucking job right?
'Obviously, candidates, educators and all the rest of us need to do a better job of promoting political and civic involvement if we hope to restore trust in our democracy,' he said.
And another thing: just when did this country, our Republic, become a democracy? I don't want anyone to belive in democracy. I want no part of "Mob Rule." I suggest a test for office holding, one of the pass/fail questions being "The United States of America is:
A. A Democracy, where every citizen has a say in government.
B. A Constitutional Republic, where every citizen votes for their leaders.
I think it would save us alot of trouble.
Of those questioned, 42 percent said they supported likely Democratic nominee John Kerry in the upcoming presidential race, while 30 percent backed President Bush, 24 percent were undecided and 4 percent supported independent candidate Ralph Nader.I see the staggering trend towards stupidity continues in today's liberal campuses.
people had something to say.