<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Another painful reminder of why Marijuana should be legal 

American Veteran deported from Canada for drug charges in US

I am not going to quote the article, because then I would have to read it again. It involves being taken from the hospital while he still had a urine catheter in him and driven to the border, and spending days in jail with it still in. All for a drug crime.

Having had a catheter, all I can say is that I feel his pain. Literally; it hurt to type that out. It makes me want to smoke pot just thinking about it. Ow...


people had something to say.

Syrian leader talks out of his ass 

Syrian President Al-Assad brought to you by the Communist News Network and the Useless Nitwits
*snip*
Regarding Syria's eastern neighbor, Iraq, Al-Assad said the United States should re-examine its policy there because of the negative consequences of the war.
Yes, negative consequences like having all of your terrorist fucknuts citizens exterminated like the camel-humping semtex-vested dickheads that they are. "Negative consequences" is a bit of an understatement for "Open Season and No Bag Limit on terrorists." We have known for some time now that Syria is a terrorist-harboring nation. Nothing like getting what's coming to them, eh?

"We should re-evaluate what's going on in Iraq," he said.

"What did we achieve, what did they achieve from that war in Iraq," he asked. "It's a very simple question. What did they achieve economically, politically, fighting terrorism?
Umm, if you can't see the benifits in each of those catagories from fighting terror-mongers who seek the destruction of everything we hold dear, then I really can't debate the topic with you. It would be like trying to debate the benifits of breathing oxygen vs. doing without.

"We didn't achieve anything. This is one example."

When Amanpour suggested the U.S.-led war ousted Saddam Hussein, Al-Assad replied, "Yeah, but what did you lose as a return? The hope of the people, the stability, no better democracy, no better economy, no services, no stability in the region, more terrorism -- so is that the prize you've won for getting rid of a dictator? That's not a goal."
Rome wasn't built in a day, and building a peaceful society in a place that has known nothing but oppression and strife, with the added element of fanatics violently trying to stop the building of a free society, won't be easy. How did we lose the hope of the people? Millions rejoiced at Hussein's being deposed. They rejoiced when we captured him. Getting the ideas of democracy to be fully comprehended and lived out in a society like that takes time. Good economies must be built, they do not magically appear. And for someone like you to speak on the issue of stability when your country is responsible for those that seek to prevent a free Iraq is, is, well, you just need to shut the fuck up. How fucking dare you presume to speak about terrorism and stability in Iraq when you do nothing to prevent those that do your bidding, wether or not you order them to? Just remember, if you dont ship up, WE will ship your ass out. You obviously know what happened to the last Ba'athist puke that pissed us off...

Al-Assad's regime has faced sharp criticism from the United States, which has alleged the country shelters terrorist organizations and has failed to take measures to prevent fighters from crossing the border into Iraq.
He doesn't do anything about it because he supports it. Its known as the "turning a blind eye" play.

On Wednesday, President Bush called on Syria to be a "good neighbor" in the Middle East, warning Damascus against interfering in Lebanon and allowing insurgents to cross into Iraq.

"We're making good progress toward peace in the Holy Land, but one of the areas of concern is that foreign countries such as Syria might try to disrupt the peace process by encouraging terrorist activities," Bush said.

"We expect Syria to do everything in her power to shut down the transshipment of suiciders and killers into Iraq."
Translation: We know you are doing it, and you had better cut that shit out before we switch our gaze from Iran to Syria. You are a tiny pissant of a nation, and we WILL squash your ass like the bugs you are if you don't start handling shit on your end.

Al-Assad said that the United States cannot control its border with Mexico so Syria cannot be expected to keep people from sneaking into Iraq.
Fine, Syrian Douchebag: 1, Supporters of Freedom Everywhere: Infinity. We can't control our border because we are fighting the unwavering faithfulness of Bush to Vicente Fox, and terrorists and the scum that support them, such as yourself. But we are trying to fix that.

He said his country does not support people who kill Iraqis but he thinks there is a difference between terrorists and those who fight against American and British troops.
You know all the right things to say so that we get really pissed off. Keep it up...

He added that his country has asked Washington for technical support to monitor the Iraqi border better but ended its security cooperation with the United States recently because of repeated verbal attacks from the Bush administration.
Well, lets see: You support terrorists for decades, badmouth the US at every turn, and say that the people killing brave American and British soldiers fighting for the freedom of Iraqi citizens are not terrorists. And then you ask us for help in controlling your border. Uhh huh...You're dumber than you look, aren't you? Ever seen the fury of a hundred-thousand well-armed and well-trained Americans? You seem to be begging for it.

The interview was conducted just before the news of the suicide of Ghazi Kanaan, Syria's interior minister who led the country's military intelligence in Lebanon for nearly 20 years.

Kanaan died in a Damascus hospital of a gunshot wound to the head, according to the interior ministry and other government ministers.

The official was among those interviewed by a German prosecutor heading the U.N. investigation into Hariri's death.
Yeah, right. Just like all those former Soviet Chairmen that died from a headcold.

And an article bashing the US from a UN investigator? I am shocked, shocked I tell you. Umm, one thing does puzzle me though: What the fuck is a German prosecutor investigating a death for the UN doing writing articles for CNN?


people had something to say.

A need to rant... 

Once again on campus, it is Crosswalk Safety Awareness Day. And once again, I think freshmen need to pass a Life Skills 101 class before progressing on to higher level classes. Learn how to cook more than Ramen, how to separate your whites and colors, and HOW TO FUCKING LOOK WHEN CROSSING THE STREET!!! I shit you not, I have seen more people walk from sidewalk to crosswalk while talking on the phone or whatever, and NEVER BREAK THEIR GODDAMNED STRIDE!!! They never looked! At least deer fucking look at you! These people think that those little white stripes guarantee their safety! Just because they are within 10 yards of a crosswalk does not mean that we automatically notice them and follow their every move, just ready to stop for them! They haven't thought about the physics of their predicament; how their 90-180lb body is bug compared to a 3000lb vehicle, or a 28,000lb bus! Did someone equip all vehicles with an inertia-removal button and not tell me?

(screams) These people make me want to leap out of my car and beat some sense into them. Maybe if I hit one or two, people will take notice...


people had something to say.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

One small step for freedom, one giant leap for blogging kind... 

Delaware Supreme Court says that blogger's anonymity is safe

Its good to know that there is now legal precedent to back me up if I say that some politician (or most) that I mention by name is (insert situation appropriate slurs and insults).
At issue was a defamation lawsuit filed last year by Patrick Cahill, a councilman in Smyrna, Del. Mr. Cahill said he needed the identity of a blogger who in a September 2004 posting praised the mayor but said Mr. Cahill was divisive and had "an obvious mental deterioration."

In a second posting, the blogger, named John Doe in the suit, wrote that Mr. Cahill "is as paranoid as everyone in the town thinks he is," according to court records.

That's it? WTF? That's the most velvet-gloved derogatory thing I have ever read about a politician in a blog! If ever a man needed slapped! Can I be sued for saying that this lily-livered yellow-bellied mentally-deteriorated cur's mother wears combat boots? Can I be sued for libel or defamation for saying that this man is a sissy? Cry-baby? Wuss? How about DumbAss? If he had ignored the blogger or said that "he is entitled to his opinion", he wouldn't look so foolish.
In a 33-page opinion, the five justices reversed the lower court, saying the judge used a standard that was incorrect because it was not stringent enough. The court said, "The Internet provides a means of communication where a person wronged by statements of an anonymous poster can respond instantly, can respond to the alleged defamatory statements on the same site or blog, and thus, can, almost contemporaneously, respond to the same audience that initially read the allegedly defamatory statements."

Well, they can, but they often don't. And, while I agree with the general ruling, where is the bit about the right to express your opinion?

David Finger, the blogger's lawyer, said: "Statements on an electronic bulletin board with hyperbole and profanity are generally not considered as credible sources of facts. The court found that people who read these types of blogs cannot reasonably expect them to be anything more than the writer's opinion."

Some of us who give our opinions do occasionally report factual stories, and by saying that we aren't credible hurts us in the long run. But, not many will see this ruling, they will just hear that some DE court ruled infavor of a blogger publishing his opinion.


people had something to say.

Opinions are like... 

Brits try to outlaw religious opinions

Mr Clarke recently said he wanted to stop "nasty and extreme behaviour" which destroyed individuals and divided communities.
Well, just how many ways can that be defined? I love a good law with based completly upon subjectivity...

"This is not just about doctrine. This is not even about theological opposition. This is about our basic freedom to speak and to preach.

"It affects people's freedom to discuss and to critique anything because it might upset or offend somebody else and that is very serious."
Astonishing. Thoughtcrime, anyone? Who would enforce this?

From Wikipedia:
The term "Thought Police", by extension, has come to refer to real or perceived enforcement of ideological correctness in any modern or historical contexts.

The more I think about it, the more I think Orwell wasn't a fiction-writing author. Instead, I start seeing marked similarities in style and impact with his writings and those of Nostradamus.


Political correctness is intellectual fascism.


people had something to say.

What is this lunacy? 

Lobbyists in charge of establishing hierarchy of needs instead of experts

Ok, lets just put aside the fact that most lobbyists shouldn't be in charge of their own bowels, because it inevitibly ends up in some federal trash known as a "law". Now we are putting them directly in charge of making sure people are prioritized according to their needs, before the shit hits the fan? Words do not begin to describe...

Two lobbying groups, chosen by Louisiana to collect emergency requests from hospitals and nursing homes during Hurricane Katrina, found themselves instead scrambling to arrange private rescues when government teams became preoccupied with plucking citizens off rooftops.

The inability to quickly direct National Guard and other government rescue teams to health care facilities had deadly consequences.
Poor planning begets poor results. Millionares aren't made overnight, not even lotto winners. Someone had to set the whole thing up, and the winners have to keep plugging away at it.

Dozens of fragile patients died in sweltering heat and other taxing conditions that lasted for days.

That will happen when the elderly stay inside of well-insulated, sun-exposed buildings without air conditioning in SOUTH LOUISIANA!!! This is why experts, not lobbyists, need to be at the forefront of disaster planning, so that people will realize that geriatrics need A/C in the South, and that hurricanes usually take out the power that supplies that A/C. You know, people with COMMON FUCKING SENSE!!!

"We are an advocacy organization on behalf of hospitals. Overnight we turned into a hospital emergency center," Louisiana Hospital Association president John Matessino said, summing up how his group rose to rescue coordination amid the chaos.

Some are now asking why lobbyists, instead of emergency experts, were left to devise life-and-death solutions by patching together church and tour buses, private ambulances and religious volunteers.
I think everyone needs to be asking that. Smart people do not put vampires in charge of a blood bank; likewise, good government officials do not put inexperienced windbags in charge of life-and-death situations.

The state gave both the Louisiana Nursing Home Association and the Louisiana Hospital Association permanent seats at the state emergency operations center in Baton Rouge and trained them to track health facility needs and relay information to authorities who would dispatch the help.

But that plan disintegrated under the magnitude of Katrina's destruction, leaving the lobbying groups to scramble to find private alternatives when government rescuers couldn't get to facilities.
It sounds like a good plan, but when you dont have the right people's ears, the most useful information will go unheeded. I could see them being put in charge of listing supply needs or supplying data to the experts on how many cases of what type are most often in the hospitals and nursing homes, but not putting them in charge of implementing or devising a plan. Once again, we see that governments, no matter how small or large, must have people die to learn their lesson. And then it doesn't always work.

"The priority mission was picking people off of rooftops and out of water," said state Health Officer Jimmy Guidry, the main contact for the hospital and nursing home lobbies in the Louisiana disaster center.
Well, that is all fine and good, but the priority BEFORE THE FUCKING STORM was to get all the people out that couldn't do so under their own power in facilities that were being paid to ensure their patients' welfare. This is why even public schools have a plan of some kind to ensure the well-being of kids during tornadoes. Ugghh.

Guidry said he argued for nursing home and hospital requests but "it seemed like forever to get all the transportation that was being asked for."

Louisiana emergency operations spokesman Mark Smith said the choice boiled down to "if the water is about to come over the roof of someone's house do they have a need greater than the elderly person lying in their bed in the nursing home? ... They're not about to die because they're about to get swept away by a flood."
No, they will just bake to death and be eaten by mosquitoes.

PPP: Piss Poor Planning. No other explanation.


people had something to say.